Posted 10/07/2026
Einstein: “God does not play dice with the universe .”
Niels Bohr: “Stop telling God what to do.”
Investing Inside the Perpetual Uncertainty Machine…..In an era defined by accelerated change and anxiety, how do we manage the risks and confusion that besets us daily? Perhaps we should simply recognize that uncertainty is built into the deepest structures of our world, and accept the limitations of our capacity to understand and absorb these dynamics.
In Q3, the benchmark S&P 500 rose 2.0%, the NASDAQ climbed 2.5% while the MSCI World Index increased 1.6%. Most equity indices squeezed out small gains, following a roller-coaster Q1 (down) and Q2 (up). It was a tepid performance versus the recent volatility in alternate short-lived bouts of technology euphoria and heart-stopping swoons.
The U.S. economy remained robust through 2026 YTD, supported by strong private demand. At the same time, inflation has proven more persistent, with recent data reflecting continued pressure from energy, tariffs, and AI-related demand. As a result, the Federal Reserve has turned more hawkish, recently raising the benchmark rate with more on the docket.
The current bull market has delivered strong gains for U.S. equities, but leadership within the benchmark index has been unusually concentrated. For example, in September’s stock-price moves, 80% of stocks in the S&P were down, the average stock was off 5% and only two out of 11 sectors were up, led by tech and communications services. To underscore this asymmetry, just four stocks are responsible for half of the S&P 500's YTD- performance (AMD, Micron, Apple and Nvidia).
AI remains the dominant market theme, although leadership is not yet broadening beyond hyper-scalers and chipmakers. Earnings remain unusually strong despite only moderate economic growth, supported by an AI-led capital expenditures cycle that is increasingly benefiting Industrials, Healthcare, Utilities and Financials. The key question is no longer where growth is strongest, but which companies and markets are best positioned to convert AI spending into sustained earnings growth.
U.S. equities, AI-linked industries, and defense stocks are positioned to outperform over the coming year as geopolitical fragmentation and demographic shifts reshape global markets. Knowledge-intensive sectors such as technology, media, telecommunications, and healthcare should benefit most from accelerating artificial intelligence adoption and productivity growth.
In international markets, the MSCI World, EAFE and Emerging Market indices all showed strong YTD performance. In particular, Asian markets such as South Korea, Taiwan and Japan spurted up 62%, 65% and 33% YTD, respectively. In contrast, the MSCI China Index fell 3%, as consumer spending in China continues to weaken, and investors remain cautious over geopolitical risks.
In our view, the next stage of the market cycle is unlikely to be defined by a single source of return, but by a wider group of companies and regions delivering earnings growth, including cyclical sectors—such as financials—and defensive laggards like health care. Overall, we see around 10% upside for global stocks (MSCI All Country World Index) through mid-2027 and believe investors should broaden exposure across European and Asian regions to capture a wider range of opportunities and growth drivers, and to manage single-stock risks.
The U.S. 10-year Treasury yield has risen above 5.30%, the highest since 2002, but aggregate US and EU corporate fundamentals remain resilient, credit conditions are broadly stable, and most fixed-rate borrowers are insulated from an immediate increase in interest expense. The dominant credit themes of 2026 have been AI, private credit and geopolitics. While these forces have driven meaningful dispersion across sectors and issuers, they remain relative-value stories rather than systemic risks. The growing risk of monetary tightening is now the dominant concern for credit markets. Unlike most asset classes, credit spreads remain tight despite a materially higher probability of a more restrictive rates regime.
********************
The Burnout Society (Müdigkeitsgesellschaft): Why “Average” Is Over…..In prior generations, the pillar of the so-called American Dream was that each subsequent generation could enter the
middle class by dint of doing average work with average skills. But now people have discovered that just working hard and “playing by the rules” is insufficient to ensure a middle-class lifestyle. Globalization and technology simultaneously raised the skill level required for any middle-class job, while lowering the barriers to entry for foreign goods and competition. In the age of AI, everyone has to work harder and relearn faster in order to sustain a middle-class lifestyle. Striving for a competitive advantage requires substantive effort to merely stay in place.
We are creatures of habit, and we cling to them even when they no longer serve us well. We embrace the familiar because the new makes uncomfortable demands on us. Yet increasingly, the only way to realistically sustain aspirational upward mobility is by living and working in a globally connected, multi-cultural accelerated changing economy. Now you need a plan to succeed, a plan for lifelong learning and skills growth. Whether it is applying for a job for the first time or running a major organization, the critical differentiators of success are self-motivation and the agency of one’s own education and career.
Instead of knowing all the answers, the key skill sets are cognition and perspective, being able to observe a system and responding effectively. AI has already commoditized most available data and knowledge. This has forced students and workers to think critically and understand other people because those abilities can help you adapt to change. Cognitive flexibility is a survival mechanism that makes it possible to act at the right time, in the right way, and for the right reasons.
Nowadays young people must be agile in a rapidly changing marketplace, prepared to change careers and look out for new opportunities. Of course, this may come at the cost of feeling harried, insecure and anxious. Not surprisingly, we may already be seeing the manifestations of a burnout society, populated at the top with a cognitive elite of joyless achievers and at the bottom by an alienated dystopian underclass. This fosters a culture of relentless competition that the Chinese call “involution,” a term describing the exhausting sense of running harder and harder on a treadmill that goes nowhere.
This dynamic is also playing out in the field of investment management. Such is life in the perpetual uncertainty machine. If you are managing money today, you are confronting a fracturing global economy where it’s hard to find a pattern. Managing an investment portfolio requires being open-minded and nimble. If you are waiting for the uncertainty to end, the answer may be both counter-intuitive and uncomfortable. Successful investment managers also require an understanding of technology well enough to see emerging opportunities. This presupposes a mentality to learn what works and build upon that learning. Ultimately, the cumulative ability to learn and adapt becomes the variable that separates the leaders from the laggards.
The key metrics for professional investors (market prices, momentum, investor sentiment, etc.) literally change every day, underscoring the volatility and fragility of market action. The bottom line is it’s hard to confidently predict anything today other than more chaos and disruption. This week’s uncertainty story will make way for another; these are the times we live in. What seems most worrying is that today’s fragmenting world may struggle to respond with any semblance of even the limited stability it has managed in the recent past. Epochal challenges from climate change to AI, combined with the interregnum between global orders, will make each shock more difficult to navigate.
For too long, our understanding of how financial markets work has been flawed. Historically, this subject has been taught like a math-based topic: collect the data, apply the relevant formulas, and the algorithms compute the answers. In the real world, it could not be more different. People’s decision to invest is emotional. Attention decides what we focus on. Bias decides what we believe. Habits decide how we behave. Ignore those rules, and your psyche will take over your life. Disruptive change demands the perseverance of learning new perspectives, and acknowledging the discomforts of complexity. There is power in taking ownership and continuously learning. In the end, human judgement will supersede human expertise.
Posted 07/24/2026
Not ideas about the Thing but the Thing itself.
- Wallace Stevens
The Thing Itself…..The first half of the year has highlighted a notable dynamic for investors: Despite ongoing geopolitical risks, elevated inflation, and shifting Fed expectations, markets have remained well supported by resilient U.S growth and the continued expansion of AI.
In Q2, the benchmark S&P 500 rose 14.9%, the tech-laden NASDAQ surged 21.4% while the MSCI World Index increased 13.3%. Most equity indices rose amid heightened volatility in alternately short-lived bouts of technology euphoria and heart-stopping swoons. The major indexes recorded their best quarterly gains since Q2-2020. While technology stocks have been key contributors to performance, gains have broadened, with the equal-weighted S&P 500 performing in line with the market-cap-weighted index YTD, underscoring this improved breadth.
The U.S. economy remained robust through the first half of 2026, supported by strong private demand, tax cuts, and still-accommodative financial conditions. At the same time, inflation has proven more persistent, with recent data reflecting continued pressure from energy, tariffs, and AI-related demand. As a result, the Federal Reserve has turned more hawkish than expected, adopting a prolonged “wait-and-see” stance. We expect the Fed to remain on hold through 2026, with rate cuts beginning in 2027 and continuing later in the year as growth moderates and inflation gradually eases. Overall, this backdrop remains supportive for stocks.
In fixed income, elevated yields continue to offer attractive income opportunities, particularly as the Fed is likely to remain on hold through 2026. We see more compelling risk-reward in short- and medium-duration high-quality bonds, where investors can lock in yields while limiting exposure to duration-related volatility. High-quality bonds remain supported by solid fundamentals and elevated all-in yields. We also favor higher-rated U.S. and European high yield bonds.
The current bull market has delivered outsized gains for U.S. equities, but leadership within the benchmark index has been unusually concentrated. Since the rally began on Oct. 12, 2022, just two of the 11 sectors in the S&P 500 have managed to outperform the broader index, underscoring the dominance of growth-oriented industries: Information Technology and Communication Services. Both sectors have benefited from relentless investor demand tied to artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and digital advertising trends.
However, exposure to the AI revolution argues for portfolio diversification and ruthless discipline. The bull case requires AI to move beyond capital expenditures and chips into broad productivity, lower inflation, stronger real wages, and economy-wide earnings growth. Stock market history has amply demonstrated that real technological revolutions end in tears when leverage and exuberance overwhelm valuation reality.
U.S. equities, AI-linked industries, and defense stocks are positioned to outperform over the coming years as geopolitical fragmentation and demographic shifts reshape global markets. Knowledge-intensive sectors such as technology, media, telecommunications, and healthcare should benefit most from accelerating artificial intelligence adoption and productivity growth.
In international markets, the MSCI World, EAFE and Emerging Market indices all rose in Q2. In particular, Asian markets such as South Korea, Taiwan and Japan spurted up 101%, 59% and 39%, respectively. In contrast, the MSCI China Index tumbled 15%, as consumer spending in China continues to weaken, and investor preference for chipmakers over hyper-scalers in the ongoing AI boom puts China at a disadvantage due to its lack of prominent hardware manufacturers. Still, even after their run-up, emerging-market stocks look relatively cheap compared to U.S. shares. Companies in the MSCI Emerging Markets recently traded at around 18.4x their past 12 months of earnings, compared with a PE ratio of 28.9x for the S&P 500.
Oil remains an important variable for U.S. markets. While elevated energy prices present a tail risk, the U.S. economy continues to demonstrate resilience, supported by steady consumer spending, a solid labor market, and sustained AI-driven investment. Unless oil prices move sharply higher for an extended period, the broader economic and corporate earnings growth outlook remains constructive. In summary, staying diversified remains essential in navigating an extremely uncertain environment. Gold and broad commodities remain useful hedges against macro uncertainty
********************
In Search of the “Real”….. Why does so much of our digitized, post-industrial, post-modern world seem so fake, so contrived? A routine stroll through social media takes us on a disconcerting tour through a fragmented landscape of real and fake, authentic and phony. This unbridled artificiality is bleeding into other areas of culture. With sudden and unanticipated speed, AI has already seeped into the fabric of our everyday existence. It’s in our love lives, our health care, our schools, and of course, on our screens. The line between reality and fiction is becoming increasingly blurred: Is this video real or AI? Is ChatGPT reliable? What news online is indisputably true?
We may be tempted to distill out the falsehoods and artificialities of our daily life, to discern the real and unreal in our quotidian existence. Often, there seems to be a gulf between our perceptions of the world and the one that we want to fully believe in, even a distance between ourselves and our idealistic conception of our very self. In our most private moments, authenticity is what we want from our world, from others and from ourselves. The question is how do we find it?
Our celebrity culture offers a paradigm of how to distinguish authenticity from artificiality. For example, the distinction between “fame” and “celebrity”: fame is a product of achievement, whereas celebrity is manufactured, dependent as much on image as on accomplishment. Social media has now enabled an entire cohort of celebrity influencers to become “famous for being famous,” available for millions of followers to indulge in their most prurient interests. Our tabloid minds are spurred on by voyeurism and a desire to connect effortlessly with a world certified to be real.
In a related venue, the ubiquitous role of dating apps provide another lens into how most adults today find and sustain intimate connections. Subscribers assiduously shape their own public profiles in order to attract compatible potential partners into their private lives. Both sides consciously style and preen, hoping that image and carefully curated personal qualities might photoshop away the less flattering aspects of their interior realities.
The problem of what we want - how to know what we want - is more complex than it appears. In a world where our most insidious urges are reined in by conventional morality, what we think we want is often undermined by what we actually want. This is especially true in an algorithm-driven attention economy which directly shapes what we want and transforms the shape of the world we see.
The mind sometimes cannot seize hold of the ultimate nature of reality that faces it, and reality retreats before the imagination that shapes and orders it. However, the problem with acquiescing to an all-embracing doctrine of a subjective world is that one can impute a “construct” for everything, relieving us of any ultimate responsibility for our actions. In an AI-driven click-bait world, we can be aware of more and nevertheless know less. We are exposed to more data, but often in the absence of history, context, depth and experience. We confuse data with information, information with knowledge, and knowledge with wisdom. We become engorged with pseudo-knowledge supplied by the commentariat, pundits and influencers. This excess of data or noise has negative value and diminishes the probability of insight.
In my primary livelihood of investment management, I presumably add value by allocating capital into individual stocks that rise over time. Conversely, I sell or avoid stocks that go down in market value. Is this kind of work more valuable or “real” than a factory worker manufacturing a widget on an assembly line, or a plumber fixing a leaky pipe? It quickly becomes apparent that what constitutes value or reality is a function of individual subjectivity, ruthlessly reinforced by the financial marketplace.
The major investment asset classes - stocks, bonds, gold, commodities, real estate - all presupposes the principle that they each represent some true underlying value. But they are also just social constructs that represent value because we all collectively agree that they do. They all rely on varying degrees of institutional trust, historical consensus, scarcity, or tangible utility. Even the latest emerging asset class - cryptocurrencies - is embraced by its believers because it relies on a controversial creation myth that touts its value as more than merely financial.
How “real” one asset class is versus another is largely a function how large and established the underlying monetary base is and the ease of monetization. For example, real estate seems more real than gold because we can live in our homes and real estate sales are commonplace transactions. In turn, stocks seem more real than crypto because the latter is much more widely held, traded and quoted than the latter. We turn to the physical world for immediacy, but also sometimes just for the reassurance of our own reality.
Alternatively, in my secondary profession as a practicing psychoanalyst, I allocate out my time to patients who share their psychic and emotional lives with an experienced professional in the pursuit of empathy, relief, insight and hopefully useful counsel. Yet, even the clinical discipline itself is subject to the ambiguities of “what is real?” The primary realm of psychoanalysis is not only reality per se but psychic reality, that is, what is true for the subject. Psychoanalysis is thus the science of these subjective states. Sometimes the result is what Lacan termed méconnaisance, the refusal by the patient to accept the truth. Again, is this kind of product or service a logical outgrowth of our search for the “real”, or is it the result of the cumulative frustrations and anxieties of modern culture and its discontents?
Finally, what is the “real thing” we are all looking for? Remember that a Thing is the sum of its effects, wherein the whole and its parts are indissolubly connected. In the active investor’s pursuit of what is real, the relationship between whole and part is hermeneutical. In the end, both the vicissitudes of market action and subjective sentiment cries out for some accountability, a governing principle for action. In this sense, Warren Buffet’s famous aphorism for stock market pricing applies here: in the short term, the stock market is a voting machine driven by investor sentiment, noise and the falsity of ephemeral emotions (“Not ideas about the Thing…..); in the long term, it is a weighing machine, quantifying the cumulative value of a business (“but the Thing itself”).
Market Views
Posted 04/08/2026
If nothing within you stays rigid,
outward things will disclose themselves.
Moving, be like water.
Still, be like a mirror.
Respond like an echo.
~ Liezi 列子 (Buddhist text)
Water, Mirror, Echo…..U.S. stocks delivered their worst quarter since Q3-2022. The tech-heavy Nasdaq composite lurched into correction territory on March 26, falling 10% below its recent high. A day later, the Dow Jones Industrial Average joined it. The current Iran War is the main culprit.
At the beginning of January 2026, economic growth was accelerating, and the Federal Reserve appeared poised to make further interest-rate cuts as markets had moved past the uncertainty created by U.S. disputes with its international trading partners. The trends pointed to the potential for double-digit returns, even after three years of strong performance. The combination of solid earnings growth, AI tailwinds, and further Fed easing could support global equities in the coming year. However, Q1-2026 saw rapid narrative rotations — from AI optimism, to SaaS multiple compression, to geopolitical shocks — fueling volatility and depressed investor sentiment. As a result, virtually all equity and bond indices posted losses, with the tech-laden NASDAQ down the most (-7.1 %).
Despite negative sentiment, key manufacturing metrics grew after three years of contraction, signaling a manufacturing rebound likely tied to infrastructure and re-shoring. S&P 500 earnings grew 13% YoY for the sixth consecutive quarter, compressing forward P/E to 19.3, below the 5-year average. Most analysts expect a strong S&P 500 rebound within 12 months, with Information Technology projected to lead growth while Energy remains flat. Moreover, Fed commentary that inflation expectations seem to be well-anchored drove Treasury yields lower as traders’ fear of a rate hike this year eased.
The AI narrative is evolving rapidly, with the pace and scale of AI-related capital expenditures by mega-cap tech firms reaching unprecedented levels. This rapid expansion has contributed to volatility, especially in software and IT services, as markets reassess the sustainability of business models and the potential for disruption. In contrast, sectors benefiting from or resilient to AI disruption includes Industrials benefiting from improved manufacturing activity and exposure to long-term trends like re-industrialization and electrification.
Artificial intelligence promises to remake economies, supercharge productivity, cure cancer, discover new drugs, and solve climate change. It is also said to be destroying jobs, privacy, profit margins, and the search for truth. One piece of data triggers optimism, followed just days, or hours, later by apocalyptic dread.
The battle is playing out in real-time on Wall Street. Software, formerly viewed as the ideal business model, is now seen as a relic, outdated by automated agents that can easily solve business problems. Asset-light tech platforms look increasingly like indebted industrials, forced to spend billions of dollars to keep up with AI’s substantial financing demands. Tech investing was suddenly turned on its head.
Prior to the outbreak of the Iran War and the surge in energy prices, concerns about the U.S. economy’s growth prospects and a continuing trade war led more investors to look overseas for stocks at attractive prices. This caused international stocks to outperform their U.S. counterparts in 2025 by the widest margin in 16 years. However, geopolitical disruption and the fear of energy shortages quickly caused the enthusiasm for international investing to dissipate. The MSCI World, EAFE and Emerging Market indices all declined in Q1. In particular, Asian economies most dependent on oil imports such as South Korea, Japan and India felt the brunt of their fundamental energy dependency.
The Fed and government are caught between fighting inflation and stimulating cyclical growth. We note a politicized Federal Reserve, rising public and private debt burdens, and sharper economic polarization. With respect to sector preferences, we hold constructive views on financials, information technology, communication services, health care, and utilities. Diversification is challenging, but unloved cyclicals may become embraced again, expecting a market-broadening trend as AI capital flows accelerate and policy support increases.
In 2026, questions about AI-driven growth and affordability pressures are affecting large parts of the economy, driving wider divergences across markets. All of the above challenges notwithstanding, our view remains modestly constructive, supported by cautious central-bank normalization, contrarian pessimistic investor sentiment, and elevated cash on the sidelines. For the balance of 2026, we expect continuing disparities across markets, consumers, and the overall economy.
********************
Triumph of the Therapeutic….. Self-knowledge is an essential prerequisite to successful investing. But the path to self-knowledge is long and winding, and there are many tasks it cannot address. Mental confusion - either normative or pathological - remains enigmatic, its causes ambiguous, and its cures debatable.
The marketplace sometimes makes demands on us to which we are not equal. It compels us to think about what is most thought-provoking. It puts us on the defensive. It humbles those who fail to learn from history. What is it that enjoins us to place our wealth - along with our egos and mental energies - at risk? The central dilemma is that many people not only do not know what they need, they often do not know what they really want. Strictly speaking, they do not really need most of what they proclaim to want. Even once they have it, they remain strangely unsatisfied.
The psychoanalyst Christopher Bollas posited, in his theory of the “unthought known,” that human beings at a very early stage are informed by many ideas conveyed through action rather than thinking. This then becomes a part of our unconscious perception, organization and risk preferences that profoundly affects our conscious decision-making throughout adult life. As adults, we spend our time looking for objects of interest (a “transformational object”) which can enhance our particular idioms or styles of life. This is an important aspect of maturation, progress, and productivity.
The professional class has long subscribed to the conscious rational decision-making process. This has subordinated the key role of unconscious processes (sometimes colloquially known as intuition and gut) at work. We sometimes trust our intuition or gut more than our rational decisions because they seem more romantic and revelatory. However, when our conscious and unconscious inclinations conflict, it is usually better to pause and dwell upon both preferences. In moments of uncertainty, using unconscious and conscious thought to address a big decision often yields the best outcomes, combining both intuition and rational calculation.
The connection between conscious and unconscious decision-making and risk-taking are complex, with multiple pathways for communication and feedback. Rational decision-making is effective in assessing large amounts of information with multiple choices, while the unconscious is more sensitive to risk assessment, especially when our choices have significant consequences for others.
Often, our conscious mind will have too much information, in the absence of any clear choices. Many people have difficulty when presented with too many options. Finally, one cannot listen one’s own intuition if it is drowned out by other people’s opinions. After assessing available information and seeking external guidance, there comes a point to stop, reflect and listen to one’s own voice, one’s own “human idiom.”
So how should active investors think and behave, especially during spikes in market volatility and macro-uncertainties? It is imperative that one should not be trapped in a rigid mindset, but adapt to changing circumstances. As the legendary martial artist Bruce Lee advised, channeling Taoist wisdom:
“Empty your mind. Be formless, shapeless, like water. You put water into a cup, it becomes the cup. You put water into a bottle, it becomes the bottle. You put it in a teapot, it becomes the teapot. Now, water can flow or it can crash. Be water, my friend.”
Posted 01/08/2026
No man is so harmlessly occupied
as when he is making money.
- Samuel Johnson
Our National Passion…..Markets continued to set new records in 2025, and the combination of solid earnings growth, AI tailwinds, and further Fed easing should support global equities in the coming year. AI and big tech stocks once again drove the rally, on the back of robust demand for AI infrastructure and cloud services. The Nasdaq Composite rose 20.4%, the Dow gained 13.0%, and the S&P 500 advanced 16.4%.
Current valuations are high compared to long-term averages. The S&P 500 forward price-to-earnings ratio, is at 22.6x, and remains heavily concentrated, with the top 10 stocks by market cap making up 40% of the index weight. The bullish sentiment extended beyond equities as credit markets and commodities enjoyed strong gains Gold, historically a contrarian hedge, soared 64.5%.
Concerns about the U.S. economy’s growth prospects and a continuing trade war led more investors to look overseas for stocks at attractive prices. International stocks outperformed their U.S. counterparts by the widest margin in 16 years. The MSCI All Country World ex-USA Index, which tracks developed and emerging market stocks, was up around 35% in 2025 on a U.S.-dollar basis. That beat the S&P 500, which was up 16%. In contrast, South Korea’s Kospi was up 64%, Germany’s DAX increased 22%, Japan’s Nikkei 225 climbed 24% and the U.K.’s FTSE 100 rose 18%. Compared to the S&P 500’s 23x projected earnings over the next 12 months, Japan’s Nikkei 225 recently traded at 21x and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng multiple was about 12x.
Our sector preferences remain unchanged, with constructive views on financials, information technology, communication services, health care, and utilities. Investing in U.S. markets is tantamount to a concentrated bet on the development and proliferation of AI. The market faces a high-risk, high reward environment driven by AI disruption, weakening labor demand, and concentrated earnings in a few mega-cap tech stocks. Cyclical sectors and consumer stocks are in an earnings recession, while AI hyper-scalers and related sectors outperform, creating a top-heavy, fragile market.
The Fed and government is shifting from fighting inflation to stimulating cyclical growth, with potential balance sheet expansion and lower rates despite persistent inflation. Diversification is challenging, but unloved cyclicals may become embraced again, expecting a market-broadening trend as AI capital flows accelerate and policy support increases.
In fixed income, we expect the coming months to be shaped by slowing growth, the Fed’s pivot toward easier monetary policy, and fiscal pressures that could heighten volatility. While the yield curve steepened in 2025, the curve may flatten in the short term given a more dovish Fed outlook. With spreads at their tightest in recent years, yield is a key driver of returns. We continue to prefer high yield and investment grade bonds in the intermediate area of the yield curve, allowing investors to lock in yields at historically attractive levels.
In 2026, questions about AI-driven growth and affordability pressures are set to affect large parts of the economy, driving wider divergences across markets. The past year marked a coming-of-age moment for building AI value, alongside tariff shocks, a divided Federal Reserve, rising public and private debt burdens, and sharper economic polarization. Heading into the new year, our view is generally constructive, supported by cautious central-bank normalization, front-loaded fiscal support, and elevated cash on the sidelines, even as disparities across markets, consumers, and the economy widen.
********************
Technology and the Human Psyche..… Although we live in a digital world connected by undersea cables pulsating with bandwidth, wireless signals bouncing off satellites, and large portions of human knowledge encapsulated in silicon chips, what we need and want remains very basic and enduring. The power of the physical, the material and tactile qualities of human interaction maintain its hold over us and reaches deep into our hearts and minds. In crucial situations, the personal connection – direct contact with a human touch – remains the most compelling and reliable.
The technology revolution has profoundly transformed our society and economy; it also provides a catalyst for us to react to market information. In the current context, our infatuation with technology has altered the nature of human relationships, driving workers out of factories and office buildings, and dispersing them back into decentralized clusters and into their homes. However, digital communications leave much less opportunity for the kind of subtle, physical communications that we relied on in the past. Moreover, instant accessibility demands instant responses and thus alters mutual expectation in a fragmented, over-saturated and hyper-specialized world.
As in prior periods of great technological advancements, technology brings material progress, but it also threatens man’s psychic connection to each other and to nature. The many advantages of modern telecommunications and information innovations simultaneously create the disadvantage of disconnection. Such fundamental changes results in the uncomfortable adjustment of many economic, social, and psychological certainties.
Technological connectivity challenges our concepts of effective communications. In an era of fiber-optic networks and computerized transactions, we still nevertheless value physical and mental proximity. This quality is hard to quantify, much less replace. We are not robots with preconditioned responses and no amount of sophisticated technology will make us so. However, we do more than tune in and listen to the worldwide transmission and exchange of information; we interact with it. This worldwide electronic nexus informs, entices, and seduces us and we, in turn, respond to it.
For better or for worse, techno-consumerism now drives major sectors of global free market capitalism. Technology and the endless gadgetry that it brings offer a powerful narcotic to the masses. There is a sharp acceleration in the amount of discretionary time people are now connected to technology. The information age has made so much information available to consumers. So much information, but so little knowledge. The pace of our modern, technology-driven life compresses attention spans and creativity. As more and more megabytes of data are compressed onto microscopic bits of silicon, the more we realize that good answers demand even better questions. Information has replaced knowledge while data gathering supplants human understanding. The convergence of the silicon chip, digital transmission technology and the human brain has dictated that information, however excessive and irrelevant, must constantly be placed in front of us for processing. The ubiquity of technology in our lives sets up a constant tension between productivity and frenetic busyness.
In many ways, we are laboring under the shadow of a burnout society. Under the illusion that the more information we have, the better off we will be, most people are willing to browse the digital landscape for news, entertainment, gossip, and otherwise mindless excreta. We are compulsively drawn to the stimulation of ever-changing incoming data. The electronic apotheosis of our mass media culture persuades us that a constant flow of information leads to understanding and that frequent communications create a sense of community. The volatility of this information barrage has also changed our sense of time and priorities.
With limited time for each incoming bit of data, we react to data rather than reflect on what is important. But information, whether real or fictional, has a seductive power to engage its recipient. It has the power to inform and bemuse us, but also the capacity to deceive and distract. The more information we process, the more difficult it is to act thoughtfully on any part of it. Banality and superficiality are the predominant qualities for what passes as information these days. This becomes more widespread as we sink deeper into the age of technology and mass telecommunications.
